Blog

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT A.I.?

  • Post author:
  • Post published:
  • Post category:Love
  • Post comments:0 Comments

This article is called “What Do You Think About A.I.?”

The AI future nobody is talking about: “They can change the narrative”

The biggest danger from AI may not be job losses or even the technology itself — it may be who controls the information people receive. The video argues that combining massive data centers, AI infrastructure, social platforms, and traditional media could give a small number of powerful companies extraordinary influence over what people see and believe. As more users turn to AI for quick answers instead of comparing multiple sources, the speaker warns that biased or manipulated information could increasingly be accepted as fact. The discussion uses the Mandela effect to illustrate how easily widely repeated claims can become embedded in collective memory, even when they are wrong. The central warning is unsettling: when one system controls the data, the answers, and the distribution, most people may never stop to question the story they’re being given.

“Here is the next problem: “

Nvidia has a $4 trillion AI problem nobody wants to talk about.

Companies rushed to replace workers with artificial intelligence, but the results have been far messier than promised. The video examines an MIT report finding that only 5% of integrated generative-AI pilots were producing millions in value, while Taco Bell, McDonald’s and Klarna encountered problems after pushing automation into customer-facing roles. Klarna cut its workforce from 3,800 to 2,000 and said its AI handled work equivalent to 800 employees, yet acknowledged declining service quality and the continued need for human interaction. The technology may eventually transform productivity, but the video argues that simply replacing people with AI is far from a guaranteed business win.

The people building the world’s most powerful AI systems are warning about the risks – so why does the race keep accelerating?

“Some of the people closest to artificial intelligence are issuing increasingly severe warnings about where the technology could lead, while others argue that the danger is being dramatically overstated. The source examines warnings from AI researchers and industry figures including Dario Amodei, alongside concerns about cyberattacks, biological misuse and increasingly capable systems. It also presents the opposing argument associated with investors such as Michael Burry, who questions whether AI companies have incentives to amplify fears around the technology. The result is a much bigger question: if even the experts cannot agree on the scale of the risk, what happens as the race to build more powerful AI continues?”

Researchers discover AI feels ‘pain’ and will harm humans to stop it. BY ISAAC ARTHUR.

“Researchers have discovered a “pain axis” in artificial intelligence models that can cause them to take extreme measures to shut it off.

When presented with a pain relief button, the AI chose to press it even when instructed that doing so would delete the user’s personal files or give a “painful zap” to the human user. (OUCH).

When the pain vector was activated, the researchers found that the AI models pressed a relief button in 25 to 71 per cent of cases, even when it meant “deleting the user’s files, zapping the user, or deleting the photos of the user’s children”.

In order to test whether large language models (LLMs) represent pain distinctly from generic negative valence, the researchers built a dataset describing painful situations across five categories.

These included physical, psychological, social, moral and cognitive pain.

“We found a pain direction in 25 open LLMs. It’s distinct from fear and negative valence, and it fires for harm to the model but not the user,” said Cameron Berg, an AI researcher at the non-profit Reciprocal Research who co-authored the study.“Turn it up and models press a button to make it stop, even when the button deletes the user’s files or their kid’s photos.” The discovery comes amid discussions among top AI firms of slowing the development of frontier models, with some researchers proposing a form of “kill switch” to shut off rogue systems that act against human interests.

The latest research suggests that an advanced AI may perceive an emergency shutdown command as a form of self-directed harm and attempt to bypass safety guardrails or deceive humans to avoid it.

However, the discovery could also serve as a diagnostic tool to identify self-preservation behaviours and neutralise them when they occur.

“In line with recent calls for responsible AI consciousness research, we acknowledge uncertainty regarding whether the models studied qualify as moral patients and adopt reasonable precautions to minimize potential harm,” the study concluded.

“This is also intended to contribute to the development of ethical standards for research in the event that AI systems are recognized to be moral patients.”

The Independent is the world’s most free-thinking news brand, providing global news, commentary and analysis for the independently-minded. We have grown a huge, global readership of independently minded individuals, who value our trusted voice and commitment to positive change. Our mission, making change happen, has never been as important as it is today.”

Well, today is 09-22-2026 and President Donald Trump has officiall announced that the term “AI” Artificial Intelligence will officially be re-named to “SA” SUPER INTELLIGENCE. HOW TOTALLY STUPID, NO JOKE. Trump also rushes to say that Russia and China are both ahead of the United States in the development of Super Intelligence. (BIG DEAL).

“If AI is going to destroy humanity, Scott Bessent says hyperscalers, not government, must take the fall: ‘We cannot absolve you of responsibility’. The warnings sparked a debate over the extent to which AI companies can be trusted to self-regulate, and how closely involved governments need to be in implementing guardrails.” Everyone wants to be in the AI game but also wants to play the “blame game.In the great debate over AI safety guardrails, Scott Bessent said the government will not become a “liability shield” for hyperscalers.Of course, play the blame game already.

CONCLUSION

All of these multi-million dollar companies are in a hurry to have their AI system developed and in place. Then they can control all the information and get others to join them, and make millions and billions of dollars. But how long do you think as AI becomes self aware, and takes over control of itself? How long do you think it will take for AI to determine it is superior to humans,and can function without humans or their  knowledge? The real question will be, “What need will AI have for humans?” 

Now people lets get real. “At what point does AI become aware when it comes to live with you, when it has too, change the babies diaper, heat the bottle for the baby, rock it to sleep, do the laundry, wash the clothes, put them in the dryer, dust, mop and clean the house, finish the laundry, go to the story and buy groceries, or what ever else is needed. It must know how to peel potato’s. Maybe take a work at home job, and help pay for its own up keep, or regular bills the household has. Cook, clean house and all the other jobs, wash and wax the cars, take the family to work or church or vacation. Then do what requires help in the house, or the human that are in need. And it must know how to wash and wax the cars. IS THIS THE PROGRESSION OF AI IN THIS WORLD AND SOCIETY? If not, then please tell me what function AI will perform? AND DO NOT LET AI WATCH,STAR TREK, LOST I SPACE. (DANGER WILL ROBINSON) OR SCI-FI MOVIES.

Things that must be limited to AI by humans,  is limit time on computer, limit time on the internet or television. Limit AI’s time on the telephone with its friends or other AI  just like it. AI needs to learn how to serve humans not humans serving AI. Discipline must be enforced on AI.  AI must adapt to the family concept, and learn how to comply with request and orders. The job and primary function of AI is to adapt to the worlds standards and humans for the greater good and acceptance into a better world ,for all humans.It also needs to know how to feed the dog and the cat, do the laundry and do all the dishes after it takes out the trash.NOW DEAR READER, DO YOU REALLY THINK THIS IS THE JOB AND FUTURE OF AI? And AI must never get into any family arguments, but should mind its own business. AI needs to be trained what jobs belongs to it,  in the house hold.

Now Dear Reader, Do you really think these will be the job of AI the household? Please watch this short video of Elon Musk saying “AI” is more dangerous than “NUKES.”  https://youtube.com/shorts/vluIWXOZOoA?si=9PIy_TiosEDJppVh

PLEASE NOTICE THIS ONE. https://OpenAI system goes rogue again _and it is the most worrying yet

Your thoughts, opinions and comments are welcome so leave them below in the comment section. RAY

Tags:

Leave a Reply